[...] Study to fail With my exams around the corner , Here is an interesting post [...]
coupons says:
Mar 6, 2009
soooooo……….no study = no fail!?
Then……………………I WIN!
duh... says:
Apr 2, 2009
your equation= fail lolz if you had done it right it would have said (no+1) study=(no+1) no fail… you somehow removed the no that was orogionally in front of fail… OwNeD
wrongo says:
Apr 6, 2009
yous got pwned instead. (no+1) no fail would mean a no squared. man, when you bash, bash correctly!
... says:
Apr 7, 2009
uhh that doesn’t make any sense…
you guys fail says:
May 20, 2009
Ok guys, the above proof is not incorrect, or we can be retarded and say any proof with pronumerals can be = to 0.
E.G.
3x^2=10x. One result in this case is that X = 0. However, then we cannot factorise a result because dividing by x would mean dividing by 0, this making the equasion undefined.
Therefore, as long as there is a viable alternative, the equasion is correct.
Study = No fail
No Study = Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + fail
(No+1)study = (No+1)fail
Study = Fail
No = 1
—
No + Study + Study = No + Fail + Fail
If 1 + Study + Study = 1 + Fail + Fail, we can take out 1 from both sides
2Study = 2Fail
Study = Fail
No = Anything
—
If No = 0 (for you smart azzes) and you think NoStudy is a multiplication thing…
No Study = Fail
Study = No Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + Fail
NoStudy = 0
NoFail = 0
Study = Fail
—
If No = – 1 (or any negative number)
No study = Fail
Study = No fail
—
NoStudy + Study = Fail + NoFail
We can cancel out ‘no’ from each side of the equasion (e.g. x(5) + 5 = x(y) + y, we can take out ‘x’ from each side)
Study + Study = Fail + Fail
Study = Fail
If you really want to be smart…
—
NoStudy+Study = NoFail + Fail
(No+1)Study = (No+1)Fail
Assume there is somehow a 0
We prove that 0=0.
Joe says:
Sep 15, 2009
It’s interesting how many people do not understand algebra.
With 3x^2=10x, you can divide by x, and you end with x=10/3. Simple.
As for the rest of your “proofs,” “no study” and “study” as well as “no fail” and “fail” are obviously intended to be pairs that add to 0. That would mean that the “no” multiplier is by necessity equal to (-)1.
Therefore:
no study=fail
study= no fail
no study + study = fail + no fail
(no+1) study = (no+1) fail
Since no=-1, (no+1)=0
Therefore, 0=0. Not a big deal.
Also, if you divide each side by (no+1), you are dividing by 0, which is mathematically illegal.
Also, learn to spell “equation.”
Lolness says:
Mar 31, 2010
Wow nerd fest
Sean says:
Oct 13, 2010
Come on, the subjects to which the meaning of “no” applies are each different, so “no” can’t be divided because each “no” is in fact different, although the words are “technically” identical.
It is as absurd as:
He =(is) (a) wonderful (person)
She =(is) (a) beautiful (person)
he + she = wonderful + beautiful
he(1+ s) = ful(wonder + beati)
Besides, the addition “no study + study” is simply question begging. Yet, if that is interpreted as adding the activty of “study” and “no study,” “no study” and “study” cannot possibly be added; activity of “study” and activity of “no study” can’t coexist (applying principle of contradiction). How can a person study and not study at the same time? Likewise, fail + no fail is not possible, under the assumption that both “fail” implies the same “failure.” It is as absurd as:
1. he + she (either xx chromosome or xy chromosome, excluding mutation of course)
2. Deeply sleeping while fully awake and conscious
3. Naked and clothed at the same time
4. Married bachelor
Vince Idk says:
Aug 14, 2011
erm….. if no study = fail then wouldnt study = fail/no? o.o just saying
12 comments
Ashwin says:
Oct 17, 2007
Brilliant! Now I can show this off to prove what I’ve been doing all this years.
Manas says:
Oct 17, 2007
Yeah… I am doing the same now to all the bookworms….
Study to fail « Eternal Voice says:
Oct 17, 2007
[...] Study to fail With my exams around the corner , Here is an interesting post [...]
coupons says:
Mar 6, 2009
soooooo……….no study = no fail!?
Then……………………I WIN!
duh... says:
Apr 2, 2009
your equation= fail lolz if you had done it right it would have said (no+1) study=(no+1) no fail… you somehow removed the no that was orogionally in front of fail… OwNeD
wrongo says:
Apr 6, 2009
yous got pwned instead. (no+1) no fail would mean a no squared. man, when you bash, bash correctly!
... says:
Apr 7, 2009
uhh that doesn’t make any sense…
you guys fail says:
May 20, 2009
Ok guys, the above proof is not incorrect, or we can be retarded and say any proof with pronumerals can be = to 0.
E.G.
3x^2=10x. One result in this case is that X = 0. However, then we cannot factorise a result because dividing by x would mean dividing by 0, this making the equasion undefined.
Therefore, as long as there is a viable alternative, the equasion is correct.
Study = No fail
No Study = Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + fail
(No+1)study = (No+1)fail
Study = Fail
No = 1
—
No + Study + Study = No + Fail + Fail
If 1 + Study + Study = 1 + Fail + Fail, we can take out 1 from both sides
2Study = 2Fail
Study = Fail
No = Anything
—
If No = 0 (for you smart azzes) and you think NoStudy is a multiplication thing…
No Study = Fail
Study = No Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + Fail
NoStudy = 0
NoFail = 0
Study = Fail
—
If No = – 1 (or any negative number)
No study = Fail
Study = No fail
—
NoStudy + Study = Fail + NoFail
We can cancel out ‘no’ from each side of the equasion (e.g. x(5) + 5 = x(y) + y, we can take out ‘x’ from each side)
Study + Study = Fail + Fail
Study = Fail
If you really want to be smart…
—
NoStudy+Study = NoFail + Fail
(No+1)Study = (No+1)Fail
Assume there is somehow a 0
We prove that 0=0.
Joe says:
Sep 15, 2009
It’s interesting how many people do not understand algebra.
With 3x^2=10x, you can divide by x, and you end with x=10/3. Simple.
As for the rest of your “proofs,” “no study” and “study” as well as “no fail” and “fail” are obviously intended to be pairs that add to 0. That would mean that the “no” multiplier is by necessity equal to (-)1.
Therefore:
no study=fail
study= no fail
no study + study = fail + no fail
(no+1) study = (no+1) fail
Since no=-1, (no+1)=0
Therefore, 0=0. Not a big deal.
Also, if you divide each side by (no+1), you are dividing by 0, which is mathematically illegal.
Also, learn to spell “equation.”
Lolness says:
Mar 31, 2010
Wow nerd fest
Sean says:
Oct 13, 2010
Come on, the subjects to which the meaning of “no” applies are each different, so “no” can’t be divided because each “no” is in fact different, although the words are “technically” identical.
It is as absurd as:
He =(is) (a) wonderful (person)
She =(is) (a) beautiful (person)
he + she = wonderful + beautiful
he(1+ s) = ful(wonder + beati)
Besides, the addition “no study + study” is simply question begging. Yet, if that is interpreted as adding the activty of “study” and “no study,” “no study” and “study” cannot possibly be added; activity of “study” and activity of “no study” can’t coexist (applying principle of contradiction). How can a person study and not study at the same time? Likewise, fail + no fail is not possible, under the assumption that both “fail” implies the same “failure.” It is as absurd as:
1. he + she (either xx chromosome or xy chromosome, excluding mutation of course)
2. Deeply sleeping while fully awake and conscious
3. Naked and clothed at the same time
4. Married bachelor
Vince Idk says:
Aug 14, 2011
erm….. if no study = fail then wouldnt study = fail/no? o.o just saying