Comments on: Study = Fail ! http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/ Tech Tips / Reviews Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:57:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Joe http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-16458 Joe Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:41:14 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-16458 It's interesting how many people do not understand algebra. With 3x^2=10x, you can divide by x, and you end with x=10/3. Simple. As for the rest of your "proofs," "no study" and "study" as well as "no fail" and "fail" are obviously intended to be pairs that add to 0. That would mean that the "no" multiplier is by necessity equal to (-)1. Therefore: no study=fail study= no fail no study + study = fail + no fail (no+1) study = (no+1) fail Since no=-1, (no+1)=0 Therefore, 0=0. Not a big deal. Also, if you divide each side by (no+1), you are dividing by 0, which is mathematically illegal. Also, learn to spell "equation." It’s interesting how many people do not understand algebra.

With 3x^2=10x, you can divide by x, and you end with x=10/3. Simple.

As for the rest of your “proofs,” “no study” and “study” as well as “no fail” and “fail” are obviously intended to be pairs that add to 0. That would mean that the “no” multiplier is by necessity equal to (-)1.

Therefore:

no study=fail
study= no fail

no study + study = fail + no fail
(no+1) study = (no+1) fail

Since no=-1, (no+1)=0

Therefore, 0=0. Not a big deal.

Also, if you divide each side by (no+1), you are dividing by 0, which is mathematically illegal.

Also, learn to spell “equation.”

]]> By: you guys fail http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11366 you guys fail Wed, 20 May 2009 12:29:29 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-11366 Ok guys, the above proof is not incorrect, or we can be retarded and say any proof with pronumerals can be = to 0. E.G. 3x^2=10x. One result in this case is that X = 0. However, then we cannot factorise a result because dividing by x would mean dividing by 0, this making the equasion undefined. Therefore, as long as there is a viable alternative, the equasion is correct. Study = No fail No Study = Fail --- NoStudy + Study = NoFail + fail (No+1)study = (No+1)fail Study = Fail No = 1 --- No + Study + Study = No + Fail + Fail If 1 + Study + Study = 1 + Fail + Fail, we can take out 1 from both sides 2Study = 2Fail Study = Fail No = Anything --- If No = 0 (for you smart azzes) and you think NoStudy is a multiplication thing... No Study = Fail Study = No Fail --- NoStudy + Study = NoFail + Fail NoStudy = 0 NoFail = 0 Study = Fail --- If No = - 1 (or any negative number) No study = Fail Study = No fail --- NoStudy + Study = Fail + NoFail We can cancel out 'no' from each side of the equasion (e.g. x(5) + 5 = x(y) + y, we can take out 'x' from each side) Study + Study = Fail + Fail Study = Fail If you really want to be smart... --- NoStudy+Study = NoFail + Fail (No+1)Study = (No+1)Fail Assume there is somehow a 0 We prove that 0=0. Ok guys, the above proof is not incorrect, or we can be retarded and say any proof with pronumerals can be = to 0.

E.G.

3x^2=10x. One result in this case is that X = 0. However, then we cannot factorise a result because dividing by x would mean dividing by 0, this making the equasion undefined.

Therefore, as long as there is a viable alternative, the equasion is correct.

Study = No fail
No Study = Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + fail
(No+1)study = (No+1)fail
Study = Fail
No = 1
—

No + Study + Study = No + Fail + Fail
If 1 + Study + Study = 1 + Fail + Fail, we can take out 1 from both sides
2Study = 2Fail
Study = Fail
No = Anything
—

If No = 0 (for you smart azzes) and you think NoStudy is a multiplication thing…
No Study = Fail
Study = No Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + Fail
NoStudy = 0
NoFail = 0
Study = Fail
—

If No = – 1 (or any negative number)
No study = Fail
Study = No fail
—
NoStudy + Study = Fail + NoFail
We can cancel out ‘no’ from each side of the equasion (e.g. x(5) + 5 = x(y) + y, we can take out ‘x’ from each side)
Study + Study = Fail + Fail
Study = Fail

If you really want to be smart…
—
NoStudy+Study = NoFail + Fail
(No+1)Study = (No+1)Fail

Assume there is somehow a 0

We prove that 0=0.

]]> By: ... http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9942 ... Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:08:15 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9942 uhh that doesn't make any sense... uhh that doesn’t make any sense…

]]> By: wrongo http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9909 wrongo Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:56:52 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9909 yous got pwned instead. (no+1) no fail would mean a no squared. man, when you bash, bash correctly! yous got pwned instead. (no+1) no fail would mean a no squared. man, when you bash, bash correctly!

]]> By: duh... http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9798 duh... Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:02:33 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9798 your equation= fail lolz if you had done it right it would have said (no+1) study=(no+1) no fail... you somehow removed the no that was orogionally in front of fail... OwNeD your equation= fail lolz if you had done it right it would have said (no+1) study=(no+1) no fail… you somehow removed the no that was orogionally in front of fail… OwNeD

]]> By: coupons http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9177 coupons Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:18:09 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9177 soooooo..........no study = no fail!? Then........................I WIN! :D soooooo……….no study = no fail!?

Then……………………I WIN! :D

]]> By: Study to fail « Eternal Voice http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1014 Study to fail « Eternal Voice Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:54:44 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-1014 [...] Study to fail With my exams around the corner , Here is an interesting post [...] [...] Study to fail With my exams around the corner , Here is an interesting post [...]

]]> By: Manas http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1012 Manas Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:40:35 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-1012 Yeah... I am doing the same now to all the bookworms.... :P Yeah… I am doing the same now to all the bookworms…. :P

]]> By: Ashwin http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1011 Ashwin Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:37:28 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-1011 Brilliant! Now I can show this off to prove what I've been doing all this years. :D Brilliant! Now I can show this off to prove what I’ve been doing all this years. :D

]]>