Comments on: Study = Fail ! http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/ A Personal Technology Blog Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:05:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Vince Idk http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-119722 Vince Idk Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:36:40 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-119722 erm..... if no study = fail then wouldnt study = fail/no? o.o just saying erm….. if no study = fail then wouldnt study = fail/no? o.o just saying

]]> By: Sean http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-47309 Sean Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:29:31 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-47309 Come on, the subjects to which the meaning of "no" applies are each different, so "no" can't be divided because each "no" is in fact different, although the words are "technically" identical. It is as absurd as: He =(is) (a) wonderful (person) She =(is) (a) beautiful (person) he + she = wonderful + beautiful he(1+ s) = ful(wonder + beati) Besides, the addition "no study + study" is simply question begging. Yet, if that is interpreted as adding the activty of "study" and "no study," "no study" and "study" cannot possibly be added; activity of "study" and activity of "no study" can't coexist (applying principle of contradiction). How can a person study and not study at the same time? Likewise, fail + no fail is not possible, under the assumption that both "fail" implies the same "failure." It is as absurd as: 1. he + she (either xx chromosome or xy chromosome, excluding mutation of course) 2. Deeply sleeping while fully awake and conscious 3. Naked and clothed at the same time 4. Married bachelor Come on, the subjects to which the meaning of “no” applies are each different, so “no” can’t be divided because each “no” is in fact different, although the words are “technically” identical.
It is as absurd as:
He =(is) (a) wonderful (person)
She =(is) (a) beautiful (person)

he + she = wonderful + beautiful

he(1+ s) = ful(wonder + beati)

Besides, the addition “no study + study” is simply question begging. Yet, if that is interpreted as adding the activty of “study” and “no study,” “no study” and “study” cannot possibly be added; activity of “study” and activity of “no study” can’t coexist (applying principle of contradiction). How can a person study and not study at the same time? Likewise, fail + no fail is not possible, under the assumption that both “fail” implies the same “failure.” It is as absurd as:
1. he + she (either xx chromosome or xy chromosome, excluding mutation of course)
2. Deeply sleeping while fully awake and conscious
3. Naked and clothed at the same time
4. Married bachelor

]]> By: Lolness http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-27619 Lolness Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:12:54 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-27619 Wow nerd fest Wow nerd fest

]]> By: Joe http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-16458 Joe Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:41:14 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-16458 It's interesting how many people do not understand algebra. With 3x^2=10x, you can divide by x, and you end with x=10/3. Simple. As for the rest of your "proofs," "no study" and "study" as well as "no fail" and "fail" are obviously intended to be pairs that add to 0. That would mean that the "no" multiplier is by necessity equal to (-)1. Therefore: no study=fail study= no fail no study + study = fail + no fail (no+1) study = (no+1) fail Since no=-1, (no+1)=0 Therefore, 0=0. Not a big deal. Also, if you divide each side by (no+1), you are dividing by 0, which is mathematically illegal. Also, learn to spell "equation." It’s interesting how many people do not understand algebra.

With 3x^2=10x, you can divide by x, and you end with x=10/3. Simple.

As for the rest of your “proofs,” “no study” and “study” as well as “no fail” and “fail” are obviously intended to be pairs that add to 0. That would mean that the “no” multiplier is by necessity equal to (-)1.

Therefore:

no study=fail
study= no fail

no study + study = fail + no fail
(no+1) study = (no+1) fail

Since no=-1, (no+1)=0

Therefore, 0=0. Not a big deal.

Also, if you divide each side by (no+1), you are dividing by 0, which is mathematically illegal.

Also, learn to spell “equation.”

]]> By: you guys fail http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11366 you guys fail Wed, 20 May 2009 12:29:29 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-11366 Ok guys, the above proof is not incorrect, or we can be retarded and say any proof with pronumerals can be = to 0. E.G. 3x^2=10x. One result in this case is that X = 0. However, then we cannot factorise a result because dividing by x would mean dividing by 0, this making the equasion undefined. Therefore, as long as there is a viable alternative, the equasion is correct. Study = No fail No Study = Fail --- NoStudy + Study = NoFail + fail (No+1)study = (No+1)fail Study = Fail No = 1 --- No + Study + Study = No + Fail + Fail If 1 + Study + Study = 1 + Fail + Fail, we can take out 1 from both sides 2Study = 2Fail Study = Fail No = Anything --- If No = 0 (for you smart azzes) and you think NoStudy is a multiplication thing... No Study = Fail Study = No Fail --- NoStudy + Study = NoFail + Fail NoStudy = 0 NoFail = 0 Study = Fail --- If No = - 1 (or any negative number) No study = Fail Study = No fail --- NoStudy + Study = Fail + NoFail We can cancel out 'no' from each side of the equasion (e.g. x(5) + 5 = x(y) + y, we can take out 'x' from each side) Study + Study = Fail + Fail Study = Fail If you really want to be smart... --- NoStudy+Study = NoFail + Fail (No+1)Study = (No+1)Fail Assume there is somehow a 0 We prove that 0=0. Ok guys, the above proof is not incorrect, or we can be retarded and say any proof with pronumerals can be = to 0.

E.G.

3x^2=10x. One result in this case is that X = 0. However, then we cannot factorise a result because dividing by x would mean dividing by 0, this making the equasion undefined.

Therefore, as long as there is a viable alternative, the equasion is correct.

Study = No fail
No Study = Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + fail
(No+1)study = (No+1)fail
Study = Fail
No = 1
—

No + Study + Study = No + Fail + Fail
If 1 + Study + Study = 1 + Fail + Fail, we can take out 1 from both sides
2Study = 2Fail
Study = Fail
No = Anything
—

If No = 0 (for you smart azzes) and you think NoStudy is a multiplication thing…
No Study = Fail
Study = No Fail
—
NoStudy + Study = NoFail + Fail
NoStudy = 0
NoFail = 0
Study = Fail
—

If No = – 1 (or any negative number)
No study = Fail
Study = No fail
—
NoStudy + Study = Fail + NoFail
We can cancel out ‘no’ from each side of the equasion (e.g. x(5) + 5 = x(y) + y, we can take out ‘x’ from each side)
Study + Study = Fail + Fail
Study = Fail

If you really want to be smart…
—
NoStudy+Study = NoFail + Fail
(No+1)Study = (No+1)Fail

Assume there is somehow a 0

We prove that 0=0.

]]> By: ... http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9942 ... Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:08:15 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9942 uhh that doesn't make any sense... uhh that doesn’t make any sense…

]]> By: wrongo http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9909 wrongo Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:56:52 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9909 yous got pwned instead. (no+1) no fail would mean a no squared. man, when you bash, bash correctly! yous got pwned instead. (no+1) no fail would mean a no squared. man, when you bash, bash correctly!

]]> By: duh... http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9798 duh... Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:02:33 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9798 your equation= fail lolz if you had done it right it would have said (no+1) study=(no+1) no fail... you somehow removed the no that was orogionally in front of fail... OwNeD your equation= fail lolz if you had done it right it would have said (no+1) study=(no+1) no fail… you somehow removed the no that was orogionally in front of fail… OwNeD

]]> By: coupons http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9177 coupons Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:18:09 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-9177 soooooo..........no study = no fail!? Then........................I WIN! :D soooooo……….no study = no fail!?

Then……………………I WIN! :D

]]> By: Study to fail « Eternal Voice http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1014 Study to fail « Eternal Voice Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:54:44 +0000 http://www.manast.com/2007/10/17/study-fail/#comment-1014 [...] Study to fail With my exams around the corner , Here is an interesting post [...] [...] Study to fail With my exams around the corner , Here is an interesting post [...]

]]>